Click on News Header to go directly to their articles
1996 Thru 1999
Archives | 2000 Archives
| 2001 Archives | 2003
Archives |
2004 Archives | 2005
Archives | 2006 Archives
| 2007 News | Top
The NY Times charges a fee for downloading archived articles.
Therefore, it is with regret that we are unable to make most older
articles available to you.
Albany
Deal Would Raise Hospital Pay - January
16, 2002
By James
C. McKinley Jr.
ALBANY, Jan. 15 After
an all-night bargaining session, Gov.
George E. Pataki and
the leaders of the Senate and Assembly reached
an agreement today
on a health care bill that would provide $1.8 billion for
salary increases for
thousands of hospital workers over three years. The
money would also pay
for recruiting more workers.
But the plan hinges
on spending a $1.1 billion windfall to the state from the
conversion of Empire
Blue Cross and Blue Shield into a for-profit company.
The state would also
pay for the plan by raising the tax on cigarettes to
$1.50 a pack, from
$1.11. In addition, the bill relies on Congress to increase
the federal share
of Medicaid payments to raise $2.1 billion over three years,
which is considered
a long shot, at best.
Mayor's
Budget Calls for Cuts in Almost
Every
City Agency - February 14, 2002
By Michael
Cooper
In the first budget
plan of his mayoralty, he also proposed raising the
cigarette tax by $1.42
a pack and borrowing $1.5 billion to close the gap.
And it calls for raising
the cigarette tax to $1.50 a pack from
8 cents. A pack of
cigarettes now costs about $5, with the tax.
That would generate
$250 million in new revenue and, he said, discourage
smoking. "The numbers
are clear: you raise cigarette taxes, the kids smoke
less," Mr. Bloomberg
said.
Commissioner
Calls Smoking Public Health
Enemy No. 1 - February 15, 2002
By Jennifer
Steinhauer
A day after Mayor Michael
R. Bloomberg said he would seek a
significant increase
in the cigarette tax but dismantle the City Health
Department's smoking
cessation program, Dr. Thomas R. Frieden, the health
commissioner, said
yesterday that his main priority would be to combat
smoking in the city,
perhaps using money from companies that make
products to help smokers
quit.
Mayor
Says Police Officers Should Obey
Smoking Rule - February 16, 2002
By Al
Baker
Mayor Michael R. Bloomberg
sternly pledged yesterday to stop city
employees from smoking
in public buildings even if those
employees happen to
be police officers.
Cigarette
Tax Would Cost State Millions, Critic Says - March
2, 2002
By Shaila
K. Dewan
Topping the list of
things Mayor Michael R. Bloomberg is asking for from Albany this year is
permission
to raise the cigarette
tax to $1.50 a pack, a budget-balancing measure that the city is touting
as
pain-free for the
state. But one budget critic, citing the city's own estimates, says the
measure could
cost the state more
than $200 million in lost revenue.
According to the city's estimates,
the tax increase would raise $249 million even as it caused sales to
drop by 165 million packs,
or nearly 50 percent. That would cost the state, which also taxes cigarettes,
$247.5 million; the loss
could be partly made up if people went to other parts of the state, instead
of,
say, New Jersey, to buy
their cigarettes.
"It illustrates the folly
of simultaneously treating tobacco as a public health nuisance and a public
finance treasure chest,"
said E. J. McMahon, a senior fellow of the Manhattan Institute, a conservative
research group.
Co-op
Board Bans Smoking in Apartments by New Owners - April
30, 2002
By Dennis
Hevesi
A co-op board
on the West Side of Manhattan has forbidden new buyers
to smoke in
their apartments, a restriction that real estate experts called the
first of its
kind in the nation.
The board of
180 West End Avenue, a 452-unit building near Lincoln Center,
is also
requiring the buyers to declare whether they are smokers, an admission
that could
lead to the rejection of their applications.
The rule
will not be applied retroactively, and current owners will still have the
right to
allow
tobacco smoking in their homes. The new rule at the 29-story building does
not
affect
the seven other separate cooperatives in the complex between 66th and 70th
Streets,
known as Lincoln Towers.
A
Changed Debate on Smoking Restrictions - June
1, 2002
By Shaila
K. Dewan
ALBANY, May 31 The State
Senate plans to vote for the first time on a law that would ban
smoking in restaurants statewide,
except in bar areas and separately ventilated smoking rooms,
said John McArdle, a spokesman
for the Senate Republican majority.
The bill that reaches the
Senate floor, however, may be less strict than a measure the Assembly passed
this week. Some Republicans
have raised concerns about how much business owners would have to
spend to comply with new
regulations.
A
School With Ashtrays, but No Students - June
17, 2002
By Elissa
Gootman
HAUPPAUGE, N.Y., June 13
Inside the gymnasium of the tiny Menorah Day School, somewhere
between the basketball hoops
and the construction-paper creations, is a dilemma worthy of a Talmudic
scholar.
Four nights a week, the gymnasium is filled with the sounds of bingo: the
ringing of a bell when the number 66 is
called, the subdued cry of B-1 or I-29, the pregame chattering about grandchildren
and good luck.
And on those nights, the room is filled with the smells of bingo: the delicate
gray clouds emanating from the
Marlboros, Newport Lights and Virginia Slims that are, for many of the
players, as essential to bingo nights as the
good-luck
charms beside the markers.
County law explicitly prohibits smoking on school grounds, whether children
are coloring in a classroom or tucked
into bed at home, and so Menorah Day was told the smoking at bingo would
have to stop.
But two
weeks after the metal ashtrays were removed from the folding tables where
bingo is played and the new
policy
announced, attendance dropped. More than 100 players signed a petition
threatening to take their bingo
money
elsewhere if smoking remained forbidden.
"We were struggling to break even," Mrs. Bausk recalled.
Some of the most dedicated smokers, it turned out, were the biggest spenders.
"It's a Catch-22,
and we're caught in the middle," she said. Desperate to keep the school
alive, she came up with a
Solomonesque
solution: "I said if we can't take away the cigarettes, what we have to
do is remove the children."
No children, no school. No school, no restrictions.
Three synagogues
offered Mrs. Bausk space for makeshift classrooms, and for the last month
or so of classes,
which ended last
week, the school's 46 preschool and elementary school students learned
in exile while bingo
continued to be
held.
After
a Deal, an Antismoking Measure is Held Back - June
18, 2002
By Shaila
K. Dewan
ALBANY, June 17 -- A painstakingly
negotiated deal on a bill that would ban smoking in restaurants
appeared to falter today when
the Senate's Republican majority met to discuss the bill but did not let
it come to the floor. Republicans
said several details still had to be resolved.
"The outstanding issue is how the bill
affects the small restaurant owners," said John McArdle, a
spokesman for the Republicans.
The bill would allow smoking in bar areas and separately
ventilated dining rooms. Some
upstate senators have argued that restaurants with no bar would
have to ban all smoking.
In
Albany, Compromise Proves Elusive Deals Are Scant at End of
Legislative Session - June 21, 2002
By James C.
McKinley Jr.
Deals were scarce today.
A tentative deal reached last week on a bill to ban smoking in restaurants
across the
state fell apart after the
Republicans insisted on carving out an exception for small restaurants.
Smoking
Looks Even Worse - June 24, 2002
It is hard to believe there
is anything new to be learned about the evils of tobacco. But a depressing
new
analysis by a team assembled by
the World Health Organization has found that tobacco is a lot more
dangerous than anyone previously
realized, whether one smokes it directly or inhales the fumes expelled
by
someone else.
NYC C.L.A.S.H. Note: We include all reports on tobacco-related issues out of NY out of a sense of fairness. It does NOT mean we agree with all that is listed. We urge everyone to review our analysis of this new report.
Cigarettes
Up to $7 a Pack With New Tax - July
1, 2002
By Michael
Cooper
Mayor Michael R. Bloomberg
signed a bill yesterday that will raise the city's cigarette tax to $1.50
a pack
beginning today. City
officials and opponents of smoking say the increase will give New York
the highest
cigarette tax in the
nation and push the price of some brands to more than $7 a pack.
At the hearing, Mr. Bloomberg found himself face to face with critics.
Audrey Silk, the founder
of a group called Citizens Lobbying Against Smoker Harassment, testified
that
consenting adults
should be free to engage in risky behavior if they choose, and that smokers
should not be
singled out for higher
taxes.
Then she turned the tables on the mayor and his predilection for some junk foods.
"I know that you love
to eat chunky peanut butter with bacon and bananas," she said. "How about
I come out
and start a campaign
to tax that bacon, that's going to cause heart disease, and tax that super-chunky
peanut
butter that's going
to kill you?"
Many
Smokers Are Resigned to Costlier Habit - July
1, 2002
By Elissa
Gootman
When Mayor Michael R. Bloomberg
signed a bill yesterday raising the city's cigarette tax by $1.42 a
pack, he predicted that the move
would not only enhance revenues, but also save lives.
But in Lower Manhattan, most smokers
interviewed yesterday as they stocked up on cartons at drugstores,
lighted up at outdoor cafes and
stubbed out butts on steamy sidewalks said that while the latest price
increase
was steep enough to make them
angry, it was not enough to make them quit.
The
Mayor Taxes Will Power - July 2, 2002
At $7 or more a pack,
cigarettes have become more than a bad habit. They are a luxury threatening
to
approach Beluga caviar
in cost. But while both are acquired tastes, one is infinitely easier to
quit than the
other.
One smoking advocate,
noting the mayor's fondness for Elvis-style snacks, suggested that a tax
on chunky peanut
butter, bacon and
bananas might be a good idea too.
How
a Popular State Bill to Restrict Smoking in Restaurants
Faltered - July 9, 2002
By Shaila
K. Dewan
Among the many pieces of
unfinished business at the end of the legislative session this year, a
bill that would
have restricted smoking
in restaurants seemed among the most likely to succeed.
But the session has pretty much ended, and the bill was not brought up for a vote.
Cigarette
Tax, Highest in Nation, Cuts Sales in City - August
6, 2002
By Michael
Cooper
The number of cigarettes
sold in New York City has been cut almost in half since the city began
charging
the highest cigarette
tax in the nation last month, driving the price of many cigarettes to $7.50
a pack,
according to figures
released yesterday.
Campaign
Promotes Smoke-Free Environments - August
7, 2002
by John
Schwartz
STANTON A. GLANTZ wants to
tell restaurants and bars to go
smoke-free -- but he is
having trouble getting the word out.
Prof. Glantz, a tobacco researcher
at the University of California,
San Francisco, yesterday
announced a new Web site, "TobaccoScam,"
to counter what he calls
a 20-year campaign by the tobacco industry
to use the restaurant industry
as a stalking horse to defeat
anti-smoking rules.
But Prof. Glantz's attempts to
get restaurant trade magazines to
accept ads for the site were not
entirely successful.
Bloomberg
Seeks to Ban Smoking in Every Restaurant and Bar - August
9, 2002
By Jennifer
Steinhauer
The Bloomberg administration
will ask the City Council to amend New York City's antismoking law to
include all restaurants
and bars, making it one of the toughest in the nation.
The current law, passed in 1995,
forbids smoking in all restaurants with more than 35 seats, and excludes
stand-alone bars and the bar areas
of all restaurants. The proposed amendment would add roughly 13,000
establishments that would be forced
to ban smoking entirely.
Talk
of Ban Gives Smokers, Bars and Restaurants the Jitters -
August
10, 2002
By Lydia
Polgreen
A few nights a week, Gene
Scofield leaves his apartment near Lincoln Center and meets a few buddies
at
Rudy's Bar and Grill on
Ninth Avenue near 45th Street for a drink or two. But since he found out
that
Mayor Michael R. Bloomberg
wanted to keep him from smoking while he has a cocktail, he may just have
to
start drinking at home.
"If you can't have a cigarette
in a bar," said Mr. Scofield, a 70-year-old retired medical secretary,
"what is the
world coming to?"
The
End of the Smoky Bar - August 12, 2002
The few remaining outposts
of smoking in public indoor spaces in New York City, such as small restaurants
and
bars, will soon be
smoke-free if Mayor Michael Bloomberg has his way, and it seems that
he will. While most
of the workers in
these establishments and their nonsmoking customers breathe a sigh of relief,
smokers find their
universe shrinking
yet again. The law, if passed by the City Council, will put the city alongside
California and Delaware
as the nation's most
unaccommodating places for smoking.
Bum
a Smoke? At This Price? - August 15,
2002
By Marc Santora
Valerie Lee was smoking down
her drinks at the Bowery Bar. For each dry vodka martini, there was another
Virginia
Slim. But she said she was
going to have to change her pace. "I will probably go to one smoke for
every other drink," she
said. "I just can't do $7.50
a pack."
Now, with each cigarette costing
nearly 40 cents, bumming a smoke is not so simple. Smokers tell stories
of friends who
carry fooler packs with only one
cigarette so they can claim it is their last, while the full pack remains
hidden. Some
smokers go so far as to load their
regular Marlboros into a menthol box, knowing the casual smoker will turn
up his nose.
Another possible solution was suggested
by Johanna Saum, a bartender at Bowery Bar. "People keep telling me I should
sell cigarettes by the individual cigarette,"
she said. The smokers around the bar, where packs sell for $9, nodded in
agreement, with one patron chiming in,
"Whoever does that will make a fortune."
Shared
Misery: Newsstands Feel the Tax's Pinch Too - August
18, 2002
By Jim O'Grady
"Take $7 a pack," he said, "and multiply that by 365 days a year and
you get $5,110." (The price for a pack in the city ranges
from $6.50 to $7.50.)
Most of that money would have gone to Maganlal Pandya, the store's owner.
Mr. Pandya was glad that his friend and regular
customer had quit smoking, but angry about what had driven him to do
it. On July 3, the Bloomberg administration raised the
city's cigarette tax from 8 cents a pack to $1.50 a pack, which must
be paid on top of the state's $1.50-a-pack tax.
"It's a killer," said Mr. Pandya, who has owned the store for 16 years.
"Every store like this, you make your largest profit from
cigarette sales. So how do you survive?"
One of Mr. Ahmed's customers, Barbara Boyle, has found other sources for her habit.
"To tell you the truth," she said, "I've been sneaking into Pennsylvania."
She also looks for Web sites that sell cigarettes from
other states and Indian reservations, but her brand, True Green 100's,
is hard to find. She occasionally returns to the A to Z,
partly for lack of options and partly, she said, "because I still like
to support my local store owner."
Ms. Boyle's friend, Cathy Minozzi, smokes Virginia Slim Ultra Lights.
She, too, has largely forsaken the corner store for the
Internet and occasional two-for-one sales at other stores. "I try not
to go here, unless I'm in desperate need," she said.
Such strategies and sentiments have brought Mr. Pandya, a voluble man
who sometimes sings to his customers, to the brink of
commercial despair.
"In two or three months, you won't see me here," he said of his spot
behind the counter at the store, which is plastered with
cigarette ads. "I should never have gotten into this business."
Nassau
May Follow City's Lead on Antismoking Proposal - August
24, 2002
By David M. Herszenhorn
Democratic lawmakers in Nassau
County introduced tough new antismoking legislation today
that would mirror the strict
ban on smoking in all New York City restaurants and bars proposed this
month by Mayor
Michael R. Bloomberg. Nassau
legislators said they also hoped to reach agreement with Suffolk and Westchester
Counties, which have been
considering their own tougher laws, to create an eight-county no-smoking
zone across lower
New York State.
If
People Are Mad, He Must Be Mayor - August
25, 2002
By Jennifer
Steinhauer
Perhaps it annoys him, or maybe he finds it a badge of honor.
Either way, the inescapable fact is that Mayor Michael R. Bloomberg is making enemies finally.
Mr. Bloomberg, whose mayoralty was formed early on with equal parts
inclusiveness and inoffensiveness, has in recent weeks
angered constituents as varied as the city's neighborhoods: advocates
for the homeless, smokers, minority politicians and
garden-variety New Yorkers who now feel guilty every time they look
at an empty Pepsi bottle.
Although critics of his proposed smoking policy almost always fail to
address the policy's central goal as articulated by Mr.
Bloomberg not to protect smokers, but rather those who have to breathe
secondhand smoke they nonetheless are
perhaps his most bitter opponents.
NYC C.L.A.S.H. Note: Fail to address?!? How many Op-Ed pieces are we supposed to send that they refuse to print before they say we do?
A
Jubilant Barroom Toast to Smoke-Free Air - August
27, 2002
By Jane
E. Brody
Mayor Michael R. Bloomberg's proposal to extend New York's smoking ban to all offices, bars and restaurants - even pool halls, bowling alleys and bingo parlors - would not make the city the first to have such a law. California and dozens of towns and counties already have similar laws.
NYC C.L.A.S.H. Note: The NY Times has been most biased in its reporting on the issue. This article in particular goes on to tell the most grossest of lies. Letters to the editor will be sent disputing the secondhand smoke junk science. Will they print these or accuse us of "failing to address" the issue? (see above)
But wait! On August 20th, Jane E. Brody wrote "In a World of Hazards, Worries Are Often Misplaced." In it, she writes "the dose makes the poison." Her first piece is completely contradictory to her piece on the 27th. Hatred throws all reason and standards out the window obviously. That's what we keep telling you.
City
and County Officials Discuss Curbs on Smoking - August
29, 2002
MINEOLA, N.Y., Aug. 28 Differing only in how far they want to go in
limiting smoking in public, Nassau, Suffolk and
Westchester County legislators met with New York City officials today
to compare notes and voice their hope that others
will also take up the cause.
Dutchess County has already joined their fight. On Tuesday, legislators
there introduced a bill that would ban smoking in
restaurants, bars and nightclubs. There are currently no county restrictions
on any of these places, County Legislator Woody N.
Klose said.
Early this month, Mayor Michael R. Bloomberg proposed expanding New
York City's curbs on public smoking by completely
banning smoking in bars and restaurants, including outdoor cafes. Last
week, Nassau Democrats introduced similar legislation.
While Suffolk is still drafting a bill, Westchester has several proposals,
none as comprehensive as the one Mr. Bloomberg hopes the City Council will
approve.
Circling
Their Stogies Against Mayor - September
20, 2002
By Clyde Haberman
Mr. Bloomberg's campaign to outlaw smoking in all bars and restaurants
drew a band of dissenters the other day to Gallagher's Steak House, on
West 52nd Street. Call it the Charge of the Light 'Em Up Brigade. Two dozen
people, mainly cigar-smoking
men, puffed while they huffed about a crusade that they consider unnecessary,
given existing smoking laws that seem to work fine. To them, the proposed
ban is zealotry run amok.
There is nothing like a politically incorrect event to draw a herd of
notebooks and microphones, and the anti-Bloomberg protest was no exception.
It was, in the main, a witty group, reaffirming this nonsmoking columnist's
conviction that people in a
restaurant's smoking section tend to be more interesting, pound for
pound, than those at the goody-goody tables.
Antismoking
Bill's Chances May Hinge on Personalities - October
2, 2002
By Diane Cardwell
Relations between Mayor Michael
R. Bloomberg and some members of the City Council have deteriorated to
such an
extent that Council leaders
are warning that the mayor's prized antismoking legislation may be in jeopardy.
Publicly, Council leaders
say they are simply waiting for hearings and opinions from all interested
parties before enacting a
potentially sweeping law.
"We're in the process of reviewing the legislation there are some members
who support it,
there are other members
who have concerns," Mr. Miller said yesterday. "What you try to do in this
case is to strike the
right balance, and you can't
do that without having a thoughtful and deliberative process."
But privately, council members
and their aides say that the growing resentment over the way Mr. Bloomberg
approached
the issue could stand in
the way of the bill's passing.
Last
Call for a Smoke - October 6, 2002
By John Rather
JOHN RYERSON, the owner of McGuire's Restaurant and Comedy Club in Bohemia, said he went $250,000 into hock two years ago to create a separate room for smokers.
There was no other choice, Mr. Ryerson said last week, if he were to
comply with a 1995 Suffolk County law that sought to
protect non-smoking patrons from secondhand smoke. "It was that or
go smoke-free and find another job," said Mr. Ryerson,
adding that, for his business, smoking is the difference between profit
and loss.
Now he and other restaurant and bar-restaurant owners in Suffolk and
Nassau are complaining bitterly that local officials are
about to change the rules again, negating some owners' expensive compliance
efforts with outright bans on smoking in virtually all public indoor places.
Smoking
Banned in Nassau Bars and Restaurants - October
8, 2002
By Bruce Lambert
Nassau County tonight became the first county in New York to extend its ban on smoking in the workplace to cover all bars, restaurants, bowling alleys and bingo halls.
Fighting
Mayor's Proposed Smoking Ban - October
10, 2002
By Jennifer
Steinhauer
Mayor Michael R. Bloomberg and smoking opponents will face off with
restaurant, nightclub and bar owners today at the
first hearing on the mayor's proposal to ban smoking in all public
places in New York City, which would be one of the
strictest antismoking laws in the country.
When Mr. Bloomberg first announced his proposal in August as a way to
protect the health of restaurant workers, there were
few voices of dissent.
But in recent weeks, opponents have become more vocal, sending letters to newspapers, peppering City Council members with phone calls and visits and hiring lobbyists.
Bloomberg,
Heckled, Presses Smoking Curbs - October
11, 2002
By Jennifer
Steinhauer
City Council hearings are sometimes important. They are occasionally
well attended. But they rarely feature the mayor, a
roomful of his hecklers and a man dressed as a giant cigarette.
Mayor Michael R. Bloomberg pleaded his case yesterday to a packed Council
chamber for legislation to ban smoking in all
indoor public spaces, a measure that, if passed, would make New York
City among the toughest places in the nation to be a
smoker.
But just as Mr. Bloomberg is sure of the righteousness of ridding the
city of clouds of smoke, his opponents are equally
committed to stopping him, arguing that the legislation would hurt
the city's economy. "The mayor is a brilliant businessman,"
testified Ciaran Staunton, who owns O'Neill's bar in Midtown Manhattan.
"But he knows absolutely nothing about the bar
business."
The testimony, which lasted nearly eight hours, at times seemed to cut
along class lines, with small-bar owners from less affluent
areas of the city suggesting that their billionaire mayor was insensitive
to the dynamics of the restaurant business.
"If I had the mayor's net worth," said James McBratney, president of
the Staten Island Restaurant and Tavern Association, "I
wouldn't be here today."
The mayor was roundly heckled when he suggested that bars would actually
make more money if they banned smoking,
reasoning that patrons would simply buy more drinks. One opponent of
the legislation was removed from the chamber as he
screamed to loud applause, "It's a private sin."
Smoking
Issue Is Clear: The Other Side's Wrong - October
11, 2002
By Clyde Haberman
The defenders of virtue battled the forces of darkness at City Hall yesterday. The hard part was figuring out which was which.
If you were among those absolutely convinced that anyone holding a cigarette
is New York's greatest health menace since
Typhoid Mary, there was no question. The knight on the white horse
was Mayor Michael R. Bloomberg. He went before the
City Council's Health Committee yesterday to explain why New York must
reinvent Prohibition by outlawing smoking in all
restaurants, bars, pool halls you name it, even private clubs.
There you had it, the battle of virtues: crusaders for clean lungs and
fresh indoor air against champions of choice and the right of
people to behave as stupidly as they want.
Ah, but smoking is different, said the mayor, a reformed sinner who
gave up the weed years ago. Bars and restaurants are
workplaces, he said. Smoking puts waiters and bartenders at risk, so
it is government's duty to protect them, same as if asbestos was flaking
from the ceiling. "All workers deserve a safe, healthy work environment,"
he said.
His position made no accommodation for the idea that bars and restaurants,
not to mention private clubs, are hardly ordinary
work places.
In
California, Bars Live on Without Their Indoor Smog - October
11, 2002
By Nick Madigan
LOS ANGELES There is something missing from a barfly's hands when cigarettes are taken out of the picture.
At least that is what many of the regulars at Molly Malone's have believed
since Jan. 1, 1998, when a California law banned
smoking in restaurants and bars. The bottom line suffered, too.
"It was devastating for about a year and a half," said Sean Ryan, a bartender at Malone's, as he served a Coors at noon today to a customer at the dark end of the bar on Fairfax Avenue. "It emptied the place. It wasn't a subtle difference; it was huge."
California, known for a generally progressive view toward healthful living, may have been the perfect place to enact such a wide-ranging law, the first in the country. In New York, it may not be so easy.
"They're going to have a tougher time the personality of New Yorkers
doesn't lend itself to being pushed around," said an
engineer named Ken, who chose not to give his last name as he sat at
the bar at Malone's.
The
Smoke Nazis - October 19, 2002
By Bill Keller
The mayor of New York City does not seem to be a particularly puritanical man. Michael Bloomberg is a guy who, when asked if he had ever tried marijuana, replied: "You bet I did. And I enjoyed it." (Alas, he's not willing to advocate decriminalizing the experience for the rest of us, but that's a subject for another day.) He once fondly likened his college fraternity to the one in "Animal House," and he still enjoys a party. He is no libertarian, let alone libertine, but his attitude toward private pleasure is pretty much live and let live.
On the subject of tobacco, though, he has surprised many constituents with his zeal. First he slapped on a city tax increase that raises the price of a pack of cigarettes to around $7. Now he proposes to outlaw smoking in every bar and restaurant in the five boroughs of New York.
Is this the smug virtue of a reformed smoker? A bit of bash-tobacco political opportunism? A rich man's paternalism toward what has become more and more a working-class vice? It's not unreasonable to suspect a bit of each: Mr. Bloomberg is a convert from a pack-a-day habit, Big Tobacco is the domestic equivalent of Saddam Hussein, and Mr. Bloomberg's class empathy is more top-hat than tip-jar.
Lax
New York Laws Make Big Money Bigger - October
22, 2002
By RICHARD
PÉREZ-PEÑA
ALBANY, Oct. 21 A remarkable series of legislative battles was fought
here over the last year, linked by a recurring
theme. In each case, powerful business and labor interests, armed with
well-connected lobbyists and money for campaign
contributions, won a victory that looked unlikely not too long before.
The Legislature and Gov. George E. Pataki legalized several forms of gambling that they had earlier rejected. They appeared poised to ban smoking in restaurants, then let the measure die.
Governor Pataki avoided commenting on the no-smoking bill until late
in the legislative session, when he and his aides said that
he had concerns about its effects on small restaurants, but that he
had not formed a position. Several Republican senators said
that, in fact, the governor was privately pressing Mr. Bruno to either
kill the bill or water it down severely, a claim the governor's office
denied.
Mr. Bruno said the bill died over a matter of principle.
"There was a legitimate concern about not hurting small businesses,"
he said. "We heard their concerns, and we were not going
to ignore them." The campaign contributions, he said, "had nothing
to do with it."
A
City Councilman Proposes a Narrower Ban on Smoking - October
23, 2002
By Thomas
J. Lueck
One of Mayor Michael R. Bloomberg's staunchest allies on the City Council
called yesterday for less sweeping antismoking
legislation, a sign that the mayor's effort to ban smoking in all indoor
public spaces faces stiff political resistance.
The councilman, James S. Oddo, a Staten Island Republican, has been a sponsor of the bill the mayor has promoted that would extend the city's smoking ban to every bar and restaurant and to other indoor settings, as well as to outdoor cafes.
But in a letter to Gifford Miller, the council speaker, Mr. Oddo described
"a vast array of differing views" on the mayor's
proposal.
He asked that a more moderate smoking bill, which Mr. Oddo introduced
in April, should be brought to a Council vote before
the one sought by the mayor.
Mr. Oddo said he handed Mr. Miller a copy of the letter late yesterday,
as both were leaving City Hall, but did not know how
Mr. Miller would respond.
"He read a few lines, looked at me to see if I was serious, and left," Mr. Oddo said.
Mr. Miller did not return telephone calls for comment last night.
Cigarette
Makers Take Anti-Smoking Ads Personally - October
27, 2002
By Alina Tugend
Body bags. Dying rats. Dog urine.
These are some of the images used in state and nationwide anti-smoking
commercials that are sounding a contentious theme.
Rather than spotlighting the ill effects of cigarettes, the ads are
focusing on the supposed evils of the tobacco industry.
The commercials, which run on youth-oriented television and radio stations,
rotate every few months. Among the most vivid are
ones that depict body bags piled up in front of the headquarters of
Philip Morris, gasping rats to dramatize that cigarettes include the same
ingredient ammonia as rat poison, and a dog walker offering to sell
dog urine to tobacco companies because cigarettes contain urea.
Anti-smoking advocates and tobacco companies agree that the campaign
has been highly effective. But while
smoking-prevention groups say that such campaigns resonate, especially
with teenagers, industry officials argue that in some
cases they do little more than vilify cigarette companies and their
employees.
Passage
of Antismoking Law May Be Linked to Wage Bill - October
31, 2002
By Diane Cardwell
The City Council and the Bloomberg administration remained at an impasse yesterday over the mayor's antismoking legislation, as Council officials hastily scheduled a second hearing on the measure for tomorrow.
From the beginning, Mayor Michael R. Bloomberg has made it clear that
extending the city's antismoking law to small
restaurants, bars and bar areas was a personal policy goal, but it
has faced opposition in the Council from members worried
about the economic impact on establishments in their neighborhoods.
Speaker Gifford Miller has remained noncommittal on the smoking bill,
and officials signaled that he would not support it unless
the mayor backed Mr. Miller's own pet measure: a bill to guarantee
certain workers a so-called living wage, which the
administration has opposed.
Officials have insisted that the two measures were being considered
separately and on the merits alone, but Mr. Miller had
suggested to Mr. Bloomberg that if he could provide a version of the
living wage bill that he could live with, the Council would
try to accommodate him in the same fashion on the smoking legislation,
according to someone who was involved in the
negotiations.
Council officials had hoped to reach such an agreement on the living
wage bill before yesterday's committee vote. In exchange,
they would schedule a speedy hearing on the smoking bill, at which
they could present a compromise acceptable to the
Bloomberg administration. It appeared yesterday that none of those
goals had been met.
After a day of frantic negotiations, a Council committee passed a version
of the living wage bill that Mr. Bloomberg had not yet
decided whether to sign, said Edward Skyler, a spokesman for the mayor.
And although the Council had scheduled a hearing for tomorrow on the smoking
bill, officials said they could always cancel it.
Council
Hearing on Smoking Delayed as Talks Continue - November
1, 2002
By Diane
Cardwell
A second City Council hearing on Mayor Michael R. Bloomberg's sweeping antismoking bill one that promised to be another version of the circus-like first hearing three weeks ago was abruptly canceled yesterday.
Officials said negotiations behind the scenes, which could lead to an
exemption for cigar bars if a law is eventually enacted, had
not progressed enough for a hearing today.
"With interested parties on both sides of the issue expressing the need for more time, and with negotiations continuing, we simply felt it was best to defer the hearing to a later date," said Chris Policano, a spokesman for the council speaker, Gifford Miller.
So far, Council leaders have shown an unwillingness to simply go along.
The recent vote in Nassau County to extend its smoking ban to bars,
restaurants, bowling alleys and bingo halls has put extra
pressure on Mr. Bloomberg: for him to win anything less than the sweeping
legislation he is seeking could be seen as a failure.
The pressure is intense for the Council, too. Many members are being
lobbied by neighborhood bar and restaurant owners who
say that their businesses are already shaky because of fizzling tourism.
The smoking ban, they say, would kill them. Council
members also say they worry that bar patrons spilling onto streets
to smoke would create a nuisance for residents, whose votes
the council members will need in a year.
It's
New York. It's Elaine's. Let Our Patrons Light Up. - November
6, 2002
By Elaine Kaufman
Elaine Kaufman owns Elaine's
restaurant in Manhattan
A lot's been written about my restaurant over the years. Mostly it's about the celebrities, the writers George Plimpton, Norman Mailer, Woody Allen.
But the place is about more than famous people. On a recent Friday, at about 4 p.m., my waiters were setting up for dinner when I noticed they'd set a large table for 14 or so in the back of the restaurant in the no-smoking zone.
The whole thing was wrong. I knew it would never work. Odds are that in a group that large, at least one person smokes. I told Humberto, one of my waiters, to move the group to the front of the restaurant across from the bar. That's our smoking section. That one move cost me almost half my smoking section for the entire evening. Didn't matter. I wanted to do the right thing.
I'm in a service business, have been for almost 40 years here at Elaine's. In my business, it's about hospitality. We serve people. We like to please. We'd much rather say yes than no. If they want their fish cooked without butter, fine. If they can't use salt, no problem. And if they don't want to be around smoke, they don't have to be. With the current setup, which was instituted under the Giuliani administration, 85 percent of the place is now no-smoking. It works.
So what do we have now? Mayor Michael R. Bloomberg wants us to ban smoking entirely. He wants us to say no to the customers neighborhood people, regulars and the tourists. Let us not forget about the tourists. We all know what tourism means to New York. And we can't afford to lose any.
The city is hurting. Hotel occupancy is down. I can't even discuss what's happening to Chinatown. I, for one, don't want to give tourists, especially international travelers, one more reason for not coming to New York. Yet the Bloomberg administration wants us restaurateurs to tell them that if they want a cigar or cigarette after dinner, no go. Can we afford to lose this business? I don't think so.
So I have a plan. It's very simple. The city wants to protect people from second-hand smoke. We restaurateurs want to keep doing business. And the city needs money to close its huge budget gap. So I propose a smoking license for restaurants, hotels and bars. It would be similar to a liquor license. For let's say $1,500 or $2,000 a year, a restaurateur, hotelier or bar owner could obtain a license for each of its venues. With the license, we would simply maintain the current smoking laws, which confine smoking to the bar area in all restaurants with more than 35 seats.
We'd post a sign out front, letting people know we're a smoking establishment. And here's a grown-up idea: let people make their own decision about whether to enter. As far as the employees go, it's up to them, too. Since not all restaurants will choose to be smoking establishments, the work force will have other options.
Say there are 20,000 places to eat and drink in the five boroughs. At $1,500 to $2,000 a year, the city would make about $40 million. Then you throw in the hotels and you're talking major change. Even if only half of the places apply for the license, you still have a nice, healthy number. (Oh, and for the record, I quit smoking years ago.)
Budget
Talks May Delay Vote on Mayor's No-Smoking Bill - November
12, 2002
By Jennifer
Steinhauer
City officials said yesterday that lawmakers would almost certainly not vote today on Mayor Michael R. Bloomberg's proposal to ban smoking in all public spaces in New York, meaning the measure might be overshadowed by the budget issue.
Mr. Bloomberg views the smoking bill as the most important piece of
municipal legislation he has sought since taking office, and
he had hoped to have the bill wrapped up by the Great American Smokeout
on Nov. 21. But passage is now considered highly
unlikely by that date, as the bill will now take a back seat to the
intensifying budget negotiations taking place between the mayor's staff
and the City Council.
Council leaders and the mayor have been unable to agree on the breadth
of the mayor's proposed bill. Mr. Bloomberg, who
views a smoking ban as a worker protection, would like to see smoking
outlawed in all bars, restaurants and outdoor cafes. The current law, passed
in 1995, bans smoking only in restaurants that seat more than 35 people.
Council members would like to see some exemptions, like cigar bars,
stand-alone bars or restaurants that create an enclosed
smoking area.
Councilwoman
Sees No Vote on Smoking Ban This Year - November
13, 2002
By Diane Cardwell
Mayor Michael R. Bloomberg's proposal to ban smoking in almost all public places is unlikely to go to a vote before the end of this year, a City Council member with a vital role in the legislation said yesterday.
The council member, Christine Quinn, commented on the legislation's
slim chances for rapid action after a second marathon
hearing on the matter brought to City Hall an array of people for and
against the mayor's proposed smoking ban.
"There's obviously a lot that's going to be on our agenda now potential
tax increases, the budget modification so we're
going to have to do this in the context of all of that," Ms. Quinn,
chairwoman of the council's Health Committee, said.
"So it makes it less likely that this passes by the end of this calendar year," she said. Ms. Quinn emphasized it was not impossible and said negotiations would continue.
A delay would be a disappointment for Mr. Bloomberg, who wanted a law
to sign by the Great American Smokeout on Nov.
21.
Some council members would like to see cigar bars, small owner-operated
bars and businesses that create enclosed smoking
areas or install high-tech filtration systems exempted from the new
law. But because the two sides have not reached an
agreement, the Nov. 21 deadline is considered all but impossible to
meet, and it may be some time before the bill can come up
for a vote, officials said. Ms. Quinn plans a third hearing, but has
not scheduled it.
As negotiations over the budget heat up, the smoking issue is moving
to the back burner. Mr. Bloomberg is expected to present
his proposed cuts to the current budget tomorrow.
"Everybody's about to shift gears into budget," a council official said.
"There's no longer a feeling that it has to be done now.
Everybody agreed to move on and to try to come up with a bill."
Toward that end, council officials said, the hearing yesterday became
another opportunity for the public to weigh in on the
smoking issue. Officials on the mayor's office and the council's office
report receiving more e-mail messages, calls and letters
about this issue than about any other. And though the hearing yesterday
was far less circuslike than the first one last month,
emotions still ran high. Ms. Quinn quickly resorted to threats of clearing
the room and banging her gavel to keep the proceedings flowing smoothly.
Officials
Weigh Tobacco Funds as a Fiscal Fix - November
21, 2002
By Richard
Perez-Pena
Mayor Michael R. Bloomberg's plans for pulling the city out of its fiscal crisis include borrowing $1.4 billion against expected payments from tobacco companies, and New York State lawmakers are considering similar moves to close the state's own vast deficit.
Yearning
to Inhale Free - November 21, 2002
By Susan Sachs
Mayor Michael R. Bloomberg wants a law to guarantee a smoke-free environment in all workplaces and public places, including clubs, bars, restaurants, movie theaters and cafes.
He has heard plenty about the proposal from celebrity restaurant owners, bartenders, doctors, tavern owners and unions. He has probably not heard, however, the concerned and somewhat novel opinions of a rarely polled segment of his public immigrants.
They say he ought to stand a day in their worn-down shoes.
Indeed, many immigrants seem puzzled by the mayor's crusade to banish indoor smoking to protect workers from second-hand smoke. Naïvely, they chalk it up to an American enthusiasm for regulations or, conversely, a determination to dictate fate.
George Leccese, an Italian immigrant working as a bartender at the Winter Garden, describes himself as a light and, most important, a fatalistic smoker.
"In the morning you get up and get hit by a car bam and you're dead," he says. "You walk down the street and a sniper shoots you bam and you're dead. People die of cancer who have never smoked in their lives. My aunt, who is 94 and plays soccer, still smokes.
"Next we'll have to pay taxes for fresh air or groceries or car exhaust," he continues, working himself up to real indignation. "Everybody, but not Bloomberg, should make a decision for themselves. This is a free country."
With
Third Hearing Set, Mayor and Council Are Near Agreement
on Antismoking Bill - December 7, 2002
By Diane Cardwell
With the budget behind them, City Council leaders and the Bloomberg administration have intensified negotiations on the mayor's prized antismoking legislation, and hope to reach an agreement as early as next week.
Councilwoman Christine Quinn, who, as chairwoman of the Health Committee
has a vital role in moving the legislation, has
scheduled a third hearing on the matter for Friday morning, and officials
said they hoped to have an agreement before then. Ms.
Quinn said negotiations were ongoing and the committee would not vote
at the next hearing, but could do so soon after.
"Hopefully, we'll be able to come out with a bill that in the near future
will satisfy everyone's goal of protecting as many workers
as possible," Ms. Quinn said.
Several council members had balked at the original bill, arguing that
in a time of economic uncertainty, the cit
any laws that might hurt hotels, pubs and nightspots that attract a
smoking clientele. They also argued that their constituents
would not tolerate the public nuisance of bar patrons spilling onto
the streets to smoke.
The Council had suggested any number of amendments and exceptions to
the proposed law, but over the months, its list of
changes has diminished. They now appear to be focusing on gaining an
exemption for cigar bars and individually owned
businesses with no employees.
Pataki
Seeks to Balance Budget With Tobacco Settlement Funds - December
11, 2002
By James C.
McKinley Jr.
Gov. George E. Pataki said today that he would ask the Legislature to authorize selling bonds backed by money from the tobacco-suit settlement to close a projected $2 billion shortfall in this year's budget.
In announcing the proposal, the governor signaled that he intends to borrow money to bail the state out of its fiscal problems rather than resort to layoffs or cuts in state aid to local schools, as other states, like Connecticut and California, have done.
Deal
Reached to Tighten Smoking Restrictions in New York - December
11, 2002
By Diane Cardwell
New York City will enact a sweeping ban on indoor smoking that will include nearly all bars and restaurants, under a compromise between the Bloomberg administration and City Council leaders that was announced today.
The Council scheduled a hearing on the bill for Friday, with a vote possible as early as next week. If it passed, it could take effect in March.
"It's a bill I can work with," Mr. Bloomberg said. "I would have, of course, preferred the original version, but we live in a democracy and the City Council felt strongly about a handful of carve-outs and I said in the end fine."
NYC C.L.A.S.H. Note: Did he use the word "democracy"? HAH!
Bloomberg
Gets Deal to Expand Smoking Curbs - December
12, 2002
By Diane Cardwell
New York City will enact a sweeping ban on indoor smoking that will include nearly all bars and restaurants, under an agreement announced yesterday between the Bloomberg administration and the City Council.
But council members had balked both at the way Mr. Bloomberg presented
his bill and at its scope. The agreement includes several exemptions that
the mayor agreed to after extensive negotiations between his office and
City Council leaders. The exempted establishments include a handful of
cigar bars already in operation, bars with no employees except the owners,
nonprofit
membership clubs with no employees, and bars or certain health care
facilities with enclosed smoking rooms.
The law, which could come to a vote next week and go into effect as early as March, does not go as far as a recently enacted law in neighboring Nassau County.
The mayor's proposal elicited some of the biggest jeers of his mayoralty,
with critics jamming a City Council hearing room and
angry denunciations filling the letters-to-the-editor columns of the
city's newspapers. The proposal was denounced both for
infringing on the rights of smokers and for potentially hurting the
city's tourist, entertainment and night-life industries.
Hundreds of localities have some variation on laws against public smoking, many with their own exceptions, like allowing people to light up in stand-alone bars or permitting smoking in restaurant bars that have separate ventilation systems.
The ban as currently envisioned by New York City lawmakers has its own
exceptions. Although it would prohibit smoking in
restaurants, bars (including hotel bars), sports stadiums, billiard
parlors, bingo halls and schools, the law would allow for smoking in separate,
enclosed rooms in bars and nightclubs that employees do not generally enter
and which are used solely for smoking. The ventilation requirements for
those rooms, however, are so extensive that few officials believe businesses
would take advantage of the provision, especially since the exception expires
three years after the law goes into effect.
While eliminating existing smoking rooms in workplaces like schools
and sports arenas, the new law would leave in place an
exception for smoking rooms in residential health care facilities,
like those for recovering substance abusers.
Advocates for the workplace ban were similarly pleased with the agreement,
arguing that from a public health standpoint, the
exceptions would have little effect. Even council officials concede
that they are aware of no bars that fit the definition of the
owner-operated establishment.
Representatives of the bar industry criticized the agreement, including the exemptions.
Puffing
Till the Bitter End as the Legal Ban Looms - December
12, 2002
By Marc Santora
Informed that the City Council and the Bloomberg administration had just reached an agreement that would ban smoking in nearly every bar and restaurant in New York City, Mr. Tooher was incredulous.
"What is this, California?" asked Mr. Tooher, a mortgage broker.
Laura Stevens, 41, a nonsmoker from London, was also shocked that smoking
in New York bars would be verboten. "In
London, you go to the pubs and they are very crowded and smoky," she
said. "When you go out to have a drink, you should be able to have a smoke
because they just go hand in hand."
Several bartenders and owners said they were not sure the rule would be enforceable. Jimmy McHale, whose family has owned McHale's since 1953, said, "I am going to make a good-faith attempt to enforce the rules, but I am not going to play smoke cop."
Bloomberg
Officials Defend Compromise on Smoking Bill - December
14, 2002
By Diane Cardwell
Senior Bloomberg administration officials defended a compromise version
of the mayor's sweeping anti-smoking legislation
yesterday from attacks by City Council members unhappy with changes
negotiated by their own leaders.
Testifying before the Council's Health Committee, Deputy Mayor Daniel
L. Doctoroff and Health Commissioner Thomas R.
Frieden argued that banning smoking in almost all bars and restaurants
could benefit those businesses, and that the exceptions they agreed to
were pragmatic and fair.
Bar and nightclub owners have argued that a ban on smoking in their
establishments would devastate their businesses, and city
officials have conceded that few, if any, of them will take advantage
of the provision that allows the construction of special smoking rooms,
because the requirements are burdensome and the exemption expires after
three years.
"As has been said, politics is the art of the possible," Dr. Frieden told the committee members yesterday. "And just as seven cigar bars represents a compromise, so a very small number, if any, facilities that would construct a separate room would represent a small exemption."
Mr. Doctoroff, who is in charge of economic development and rebuilding, said the changes could help the bar business in a time of economic fragility. In a random survey conducted in Los Angeles and San Francisco, he said, bar owners reported no negative impact on their customer bases or revenues in the wake of a California state ban.
But bar owners and council members challenged that evidence, and questioned the logic of making decisions about New York City pubs and taverns based on a West Coast survey. Ciaran Staunton, in his third appearance before the Council on the bill, said he planned to lay off 3 of the 12 employees at his Midtown bar, O'Neill's, in anticipation of a 20 percent drop-off in business.
And several committee members, some of whose names appeared as sponsors of the amended bill, criticized it nonetheless.
"The thing that I think has been more appalling to me is the fraudulence of this compromise," said Philip Reed of Manhattan, who is not among those 26 sponsors. "I haven't met anybody who has read through those regulations and realistically thinks anybody's going to be able to build a room in their bar."
Kendall Stewart of Brooklyn went so far as to ask a group of witnesses testifying against the ban in bars for further amendments they might incorporate. James S. Oddo of Staten Island, who had drafted his own anti-smoking legislation, wondered aloud if the exemptions created an uneven playing field among bars competing for customers.
And Yvette D. Clarke of Brooklyn argued that the exemptions were elitist
because they would place unfair restrictions on small
bars, especially outside Manhattan, while providing loopholes for cigar
bars and private clubs like American Legion halls that have no employees.
"If I lived in that neighborhood, and I know `American Legion: no problem;
the guy next door: got problems,' " she hypothesized, referring to a situation
she said is common in Brooklyn, "I'm going to the American Legion hall."
Bloomberg administration officials conceded that there were some philosophical
inconsistencies in the proposed legislation, but
added that the Council could always revise or repeal the provisions
in the future.
Nonetheless, Council leaders remained optimistic that the bill, which needs 26 votes to pass, would be approved, probably at the next session of the full Council on Wednesday.
"I feel like further issues got raised about some of the amendments, but at this hearing more people testified in support than against," said Christine Quinn, chairwoman of the Health Committee, after emerging from the six-hour hearing. "And we now have more sponsors than we did prior to the compromise bill being released."
Gross-Out
Health Warnings - December 15, 2002
By Kate Jacobs
...two congressmen introduced a bill in the House of Representatives that would require tobacco manufacturers to display graphic warning labels on all cigarette packs.
Smoking
Bill Is Adopted - December 19, 2002
By Diane Cardwell
After months of negotiations, more than 20 hours of public testimony
and some of the most intense, heated debates of this
administration, the City Council approved Mayor Michael R. Bloomberg's
antismoking bill yesterday at the last of its
voting sessions this year.
The bill passed 42 to 7 with 2 abstentions, an unusually large number
of negative votes for a Council that tends to vote in
lockstep with its leaders. It could become law around the end of March,
depending on when Mr. Bloomberg actually signs it.
Mayor
Signs Law to Ban Smoking Soon at Most Bars - December
31, 2002
By Michael
Cooper
New Yorkers will still be able to light cigarettes in bars this St.
Patrick's Day. But by the end of March, thanks to a law signed yesterday
by Mayor Michael R. Bloomberg, smoking will be banned in almost all bars
and restaurants in New York
City.
Mayor Bloomberg called the smoking ban one of the most important things
he has done in his life, saying that it would save
"literally tens of thousands of lives."
The law, which Bloomberg administration officials said would take effect
on March 30, makes few exceptions. They include
existing cigar bars, bars with no employees except the owners, nonprofit
clubs with no employees, and some bars with enclosed smoking rooms.
The city banned smoking in most restaurants in 1995, but continued to allow smoking in bars and the bar areas of restaurants.
Mayor Bloomberg and the City Council Speaker, Gifford Miller, said that
the city's new law was meant to protect the
employees of bars and restaurants from the dangers of secondhand smoke.
Colin McCord, an assistant commissioner of the city's Department of
Health and Mental Hygiene, said the law would help fight
what he called an "epidemic."
"It is the most important epidemic of our time," he said. "Each year
the Health Department signs death certificates of 10,000
New Yorkers who died because of a tobacco-related cause; 1,000 of these
people died because of exposure to secondhand
smoke."
Still, the measure was unpopular with some people. A Staten Island man dressed in a Superman suit paraded in front of City Hall yesterday, holding up a hand-painted sign which, in vulgar language, denounced and threatened the mayor.
Asked if he was worried that the smoking ban would hurt his popularity,
the mayor said that 80 percent of New Yorkers do not smoke. "The only poll
that is really going to matter is when I run for re-election in another
three years," he said.
1996 Thru 1999
Archives | 2000 Archives
| 2001 Archives | 2003
Archives |
2004 Archives | 2005
Archives | 2006 Archives
| 2007 News | Top
NOTICE: The New York Post has recently adopted a new policy
whereby they no longer supply free access to archived material. Articles
less than 1 month old can still be read in full. With deep
regret we apologize for the inability to retrieve the full article of older
material. If you would still like to view the full article, please visit
http://archives.nypost.com/nypost/
The fee is 10 cents or less per article.
January
16, 2002
THE
$750M HANDSHAKE
By Kenneth
Lovett
ALBANY - Gov. Pataki
and legislative leaders
yesterday announced
agreement on a stunning $3.5 billion
health-care plan that
will boost health-care salaries while
hiking cigarette taxes
by 39 cents a pack.
January
29, 2002
ALBANY
BURNS US WITH SMOKING TAX
Steve Dunleavy
You - the leaders of our government
- tell us smoking is
wrong, it's bad for health, and
it can kill you.
But now we have a situation where,
if you don't smoke and
don't pay more taxes, you're not
being good to the state of
New York.
In other words, if we took any
notice of medical evidence,
none of us would smoke. But that
would mean New York
state would not get all the tax
money it wants.
April
1, 2002
SMOKERS
LOOK ALL OVER
TAR-NATION FOR CIG DEALS
By MEGAN TURNER
Internet sites and Indian
reservation smoke
shops expect a boost in
tax-free cigarette sales when New
York's higher tax takes
effect Wednesday.
April
23, 2002
NEW
COUNCIL BILL WOULD
BAR SMOKING IN ALL RESTAURANTS
By Frankie
Edozien
Smokers, already bracing
for another
steep hike in the
cigarette tax, may be forced out of all
public dining rooms
if a bill being introduced tomorrow by
a Staten Island councilman
passes.
Republican James Oddo's
plan would amend the city's
Smoke-Free Air Act,
which prohibits smoking in public
areas such as mass
transit, schools, movie theaters and
restaurants with seats
for more than 35 patrons.
His amendment would
prohibit smoking in all restaurants,
regardless of size.
April
26, 2002
MIKE
CLOSE TO $850M BUDGET BONUS FOR CITY
By Kirsten
Danis and Kenneth Lovett
Mayor Bloomberg is on the
verge of winning $850 million in additional aid for the city, including
$250
million more for schools
and a whopping cigarette tax hike, Assembly Speaker Sheldon Silver said
yesterday.
The "likely" budget deal
is shaping up as Bloomberg has signaled he's easing
off his controversial plan
to deeply slash city spending on schools -
something Silver strongly
opposes.
A budget agreement would
pave the way for some new revenue-raising
measures sought by the mayor,
including a new $1.42-per-pack cigarette
tax, a 65-cent monthly phone
fee, and increases in some parking fines.
"These are things that are likely to happen," Silver said.
May
6, 2002
Puff
daddy
Neal Travis
- Page Six
IF Mayor Mike succeeds in
raising the New York City tax
on cigarettes to $1.50 a
pack (from the present 8 cents),
I'm quitting this job to
become a bootlegger. Every smartie
from the suburbs will be
taking orders for cartons of
smokes from fellow workers
in the city and making a
bundle. You can maybe police
interstate cigarette
smuggling, but intrastate
- forget about it!
May
15, 2002
LITTLE
TAX, BIG BITE
What's an extra 80 cents a month in new cell-phone taxes?
Given the state's grim
financial picture post-9/11, who
wouldn't be glad to
chip in such a "meaningless" sum?
No doubt that's what
lawmakers are betting on as they get
set to pass (probably
as early as today) a budget steeped in
nuisance tax hikes
- on cell phones, fishing and hunting,
cigarettes, liquor
and who knows what else.
The logic couldn't be more wrong.
May
19, 2002
CIG
TAX MAY LURE BUTT-LEGGERS
Al Guart
A new crop of cigarette smugglers
is
expected to blow into town
if the proposed $1.50-a-pack
tax hike is approved by
the state and city this week.
Some bootleggers have already
tested the market, said
William McMahon, assistant
special agent in charge of the
U.S. Bureau of Alcohol,
Tobacco and Firearms in New York.
"It's getting busier, that's
for sure," he said. "It's going to be
a big money-maker."
May
21, 2002
COUNCIL
CHIEF BUTTS IN ON
MIKE'S CIG-TAX DEAL
By Frankie Edozien
and Kenneth Lovett
City Council Speaker
Gifford Miller
flexed his muscles
yesterday, refusing to provide a routine
authorization for
a cigarette-tax hike negotiated by Mayor
Bloomberg and Albany
leaders.
Sources said Miller
is withholding approval of the tax as a
strong-arm negotiating
ploy to get goodies for the council in
budget talks with
the mayor.
Albany officials said
they won't approve the cigarette tax
and some other measures
for the city until they receive a
formal request, called
a "home-rule message," from the
council.
June
15, 2002
TIGHTER
EATERY SMOKING BAN DUE
By Fredric
U. Dicker
ALBANY - Smoking in all New
York City
restaurants will be banned
under a sweeping new law
expected to pass the state
Legislature next week
June
23, 2002
EASING
OFF ON KID-CIG SELLERS
By Kenneth
Lovett
ALBANY - The state is moving
toward easing sanctions against stores that sell cigarettes to minors,
The Post has learned.
Final legislative passage
is expected this week on a bill that
reworks a 2-year- old law
that convenience-store and
bodega owners argued was
too harsh and could force many
to close.
June
30, 2002
THIEVES
BUTT IN ON CIG DEALERS
By Erika Martinez
and Todd Venezia
On the eve of the city's
massive cigarette-tax hike,
thieves decided to
bum themselves a last-minute drag - by
stealing tens of thousands
of dollars worth of smokes in two
heists.
July
1, 2002
MAYOR'S
SMOKE SIGNALS
By Frankie
Edozien
Now that Mayor Bloomberg
has
succeeded in making cigarette
prices here among the
highest in the nation, he's
embarking on a not-so-subtle
campaign to ensure the entire
region follows the city's lead.
From noon today, cigarettes
will be about $7 a pack with
the city taxes going up
from 8 cents to $1.42.
July
2, 2002
CIGARETTE
VENDORS GETTING $MOKED OUT
By Ikimulisa
Sockwell-Mason and Gill Smith
With new city taxes
bringing the average price of a
pack of cigarettes
to a whopping $7, smokers yesterday
began abandoning their
usual deli and newsstand stops for
cheaper sources -
giving merchants a pain in the pocketbook.
July
2, 2002
Smoke
tax burns them up
Page Six
NOTABLE New Yorkers are fired
up over Mayor
Bloomberg's tax hike on
cigarettes that has ushered in the
era of $7-a-pack smokes.
Food Network star and
"Kitchen Confidential" author
Anthony Bourdain described
the "sin tax" as "shameful.
It's the beginning of the end of
civilization as we know
it. I thought New York was the
smoking section of the world,
but pretty soon we're gonna
end up like Aspen. [Smokers]
are on the run. They're
hunting us like dogs, and
they're shooting the wounded."
August
6, 2002
STARTLING
SMOKE $IGNALS
By David Seifman
Cigarette sales here plummeted
by half after the city hiked
its tax by $1.42 a pack
- but despite the decline in sales, tax
revenues skyrocketed beyond
projections, according to
figures released yesterday.
Officials concede that smokers
can easily evade the tax by
shopping outside the five
boroughs, especially at tax-free
Indian reservations, and
on the Internet.
Raj Patel, who has operated
a newsstand on Park Row
across from City Hall since
1989, said his customers are
deserting him in droves.
August
10, 2002
BIZMEN
RIP CIG BAN AS ASH-ININE
By Andy
Geller and David Seifman
Welcome to the new
Prohibition. That's what bar and
restaurant owners
were fuming yesterday as they lit into
Mayor Bloomberg's
plan to ban smoking in city bars and
eateries - and
even at outdoor cafes.
August
10, 2002
BLOOMBERG'S BUTT BAN
Editorial
Mayor Bloomberg makes
no bones
about the fact that
when it comes to smoking, he's a
crusader.
No surprise, then,
that his health commissioner - Dr. Thomas
Frieden - has declared
war on tobacco.
For the record, smoking is dumb.
But the mayor's proposed
extension of the city's smoking
ban to all restaurants
and bars strikes us as overkill.
Though couched as an
occupational-safety bill - aimed at
protecting restaurant
workers from the effects of
second-hand smoke
- the Bloomberg ban's real purpose
clearly is to make
it increasingly tough for those who choose
to smoke to do so.
August
10, 2002
HEY,
IT'S MY RIGHT TO PUFF IN PUBS
By Steve Dunleavy
CONSENTING adults are allowed
to
make love in the house they
own or rent - I don't see
anything wrong with that.
With that said, however,
if they acted out their paradise on
Fifth Avenue in Manhattan,
they would be behind bars in the
Tombs faster than you can
say "Darling, it's the moment."
Yet I can smoke on Fifth
Avenue free and clear, but
according to Mayor Bloomberg
I cannot go to my
gentlemen's pub, Langan's,
to have a cigarette while I burst
myself into oblivion with
alcohol.
But the governor of the pub
pays a chunk of money to own
the joint. How can you make
love in a house you own or rent
but you can't smoke in the
place the man owns or rents?
August
10, 2002
BACK
MIKE OR WE'RE LUNG GONE
By Braden
Keil
GOOD for you, Mayor Bloomberg!
As a reformed smoker,
and a man who still enjoys a few
cocktails, I applaud
your proposal to ban smoking in bars and
restaurants, or any
other establishment where people enjoy
breathing.
August
13, 2002
NYERS
WANT SMOKE-FREE WORK: POLL
By Jamie Schram
Nearly 75 percent of
New Yorkers
believe smoking should
be snuffed out in the workplace,
according to a new
poll by an anti-smoking group.
The NYC Coalition For
a Smoke-Free City survey of 1,000
citizens says that
smoking kills more than 440,000 people
nationwide each year,
including 10,000 New Yorkers.
NYC C.L.A.S.H. Note - An anti-smoking organization commissioned this survey. Might as well hold up a survey conducted by the tobacco industry and call it definitive proof.
August
13, 2002
BEACH
BUTT BAN
By David
Seifman
Anti-smoking advocates who
convinced Mayor Bloomberg to
propose a tough new law
banning butts in bars, company cars and all
restaurants have already
zeroed in on their next targets: parks and
beaches.
August
13, 2002
$250
MILLION IN CIGARETTE TAXES GO UNCOLLECTED
By Al Guart
The Pataki administration
is coming under fire for
failing to collect
up to $250 million a year in cigarette taxes
from sales made by
Native Americans and out-of-state
sellers.
August
13, 2002
Drink,
Bet --- But Don't Light Up!
Rich Lowry
The case against the smoking prohibitions
should... be based on
freedom. Is getting together
with friends to smoke over a meal
such a noxious activity that it
should -- like taking heroin or
exposing yourself in public --
be banned outright?
Are people so childish that they
can't figure out for themselves
whether to take "the risk" of
sharing a cigarette over a
cappuccino?
Is the U.S. economy so restrictive
that bartenders and waitresses
who don't want to work in a smoky environmnet
can't pick
themselves up and get a job elsewhere?
Do we really need the government to tell
us, as the the New
York law proposes, exactly where
and in what circumstances
ashtrays can be displayed?
The answers are all "no" -- unless you,
like Bloomberg and so many
others across the country, have become
a morality-free Puritan.
August
14, 2002
BLOOMBERG'S
SMOKING COMMENTS DEEMED 'UNKIND'
By Andy Geller
Mayor Bloomberg isn't going
to get smokers to quit by
calling them "stupid," experts
said yesterday.
August
14, 2002
IF SMOKING GOES, SO DO WE, TOURISTS VOW
By Andy
Geller and Marianne Garvey
If Mayor Bloomberg's
proposed smoking ban passes,
European - and even
American - tourists say they will bid
adieu to the Big Apple.
August
14, 2002
Smokers
Unite
Page Six
JUST as higher taxes
failed to force smokers to quit, the
Draconian new restrictions
Mayor Bloomberg proposes
wont stop nicotine
freaks from lighting up. "Smokers have
been oppressed for
a long time, and they are very
adaptable," pointed
out one gravel-voiced source. Tourists
who smoke will simply
pick other cities to spend their
vacations. Local smokers
will entertain more at home. Some
are looking into the
possibility of private clubs. And if hotel
lobbies are exempted,
you can bet that smokers will be
spending more time
in them. "Bloomberg can inconvenience
us and drive us underground,"
said one smoker, "but he cant
stop us."
August
15, 2002
MAYOR'S
CIGARETTE BAN SHOULD GO UP IN SMOKE
By Jared Paul
Stern
Nightcrawler
Mayor Bloomberg, however,
seems intent on ushering in a
second Prohibition with
his anti-smoking crusade, turning the
city into a Los Angeles-like
playland whose inhabitants are
treated like idiot children
- a role they clearly relish, though
we would not.
Bloomberg may find himself
back in the private sector again
selling computers or whatever
sooner than he thinks if he
doesn't abandon this hopeless
cause.
After all, Franklin Delano Roosevelt,
a man who employed
the martini as his chief aide
in diplomacy, was swept into
office on an anti-Prohibition
platform in 1932, obliterating
Herbert Hoover - also a rich businessman
before he took
office.
August
16, 2002
SAVE
OUR PUBS!
Let
workers and diners decide about smoking
By Des O'Brien - owner of
Langan's Bar & Restaurant in Manhattan
MAYOR Bloomberg has proposed
newer and stiffer legislation concerning
"The Smoke-Free Air Act."
If passed, the bill will
prevent smoking in all bars, taverns
and restaurants throughout
New York City.
It's a bad bill - and unfair, to boot.
August
16, 2002
Fran
fans flame for smokers
Page Six
The social satirist [Fran
Lebowitz] took on Mayor Bloomberg and his
Draconian new propsals to
ban smoking from all bars,
restaurants, public parks
and beaches, Wednesday on NY1's
"Inside City Hall."
"It's absurd. It's childish.
It's peevesh . . . pious . . .
anti-urban . . . anti-democratic
. . . and hypocritical,"
Lebowitz told host Andrew
Kirtzman.
"And I don't believe
the data on second-hand smoke
anyway. I'm 51 years
old, and I have never known anyone
who died from sitting
next to someone smoking in a
restaurant."
Lebowitz ranted that
whether she smokes or not - and
where - is "none of
Bloomberg's business." She added that
the billionaire mayor
had a "poor understanding of
democracy" and criticized
his paternalistic behavior: "Mayor
Bloomberg is acting
like my father . . . If he is my father, I
hope I am in the will."
August
17, 2002
MOMMY
MIKE STRIKES AGAIN
Editorial
When exactly did Mayor Mike turn into Mommy Mike?
It turns out there is more
- much more - to the mayor's latest
anti-smoking plan than the
ostensible workplace-safety
initiative that he's touting.
Bloomberg wants to ban smoking
literally everywhere within
four walls, save for private
homes and apartments.
No doubt they'll be next.
August
18, 2002
POLITENESS
POLICE COULD POUNCE ON POLS' EVERY PEEVE
By Linda Stasi
ONE day your name is Bloomberg,
and
the next it's Caesar. One
day you're elected mayor in a
democratic election, and
the next you're looking for
something in a nice laurel
wreath.
Now comes Bloomy. First,
he raised cigarette taxes so high
that he's now the only person
in the city with enough money
left to buy a pack. Not
that he would, because, as we all
know, he doesn't smoke.
Cigarettes. He did say he once
enjoyed toking up a little
weed, which is now probably
cheaper than Marlboros.
But even that wasn't enough
to satisfy Little Caesar. Next
he proposed banning smoking
in all bars and restaurants to
protect workers. Right.
Buzzy O'Keefe, owner of the River
Cafe and the Water
Club, who spent bazillions on
bar-area air purifying systems,
said he's never had one bartender
complain of smoke. I
mean, if you hate smoke, why would
you mix drinks for a
living? That's like a cabby who
fears traffic.
Now, he and the world's most annoying
human, anti-smoking
Nazi Joe Cherner, want smoking banned
in parks, beaches,
and yes, even in company cars. How they'd
find smoking
criminals driving company cars is hard
to imagine.
Cherner says smoking should be added
to the other "don'ts"
in parks like alcohol, dogs and loud
music. Like those are
good bans? How about standing? Is walking
on the beach
still OK? Eating a doughnut?
August
18, 2002
Sheriff
Mike Aims To Corral Smokers
Cindy Adams
Sheriff Mike aims to corrall smokers
IT'S High Noon in this
here frontier town of New York City.
There's a warrant
out for smokers. The sheriff's putting
together a posse to
nail them desperadoes.
Ain't nobody going
into no saloon without holstering their
Marlboros or hanging
up their Menthol Lites.
Let's all saddle up and git us a smoker.
Lordy, where is Gary Cooper when you need him?
Never mind killers
with box cutters and Saturday Night
Specials. We're after
the real bad hombres. The cigarette
fiends.
August
18, 2002
MUCH
LONELIER NIGHTS WITHOUT THE SMOKE
By Bridget Harrison
"Where's the fun gone in
this city?" I
overheard a guy groaning
in my deli last week. "If they're
going to ban smoking in
bars, can they at least put the
cocaine back in Coca-Cola?"
"If I'd wanted to live somewhere
uptight," he added, "I would
have moved to L.A."
I couldn't help but agree.
Why is this hedonistic city
- whose unofficial motto is
"anything goes" - even considering
a proposal to ban smoking
in bars and possibly
parks?
When I transferred
to New York almost two years ago, I
fell in love
with the city's open-minded attitude, especially
compared to
London.
August
18, 2002
BIG
PACK OF NYPD PROS SMOKES OUT SMUGGLERS
By Al
Guart
The NYPD's newly formed
Cigarette Interdiction
Group has arrested
seven bootleggers and seized 1,305
cartons of untaxed
smokes since the city hiked cigarette taxes July 2.
CIG cops also confiscated
one vehicle and executed one search
warrant as of last
week, said Deputy Inspector Michael Brooks,
commander of the NYPD's
Vice Enforcement Division.
But so far, no big-time
smuggling operations have been uncovered
and organized-crime
families, with a history of contraband
smuggling, are not
believed to be involved.
"It's all low-level, clandestine sales," Brooks said.